Existing Users: Because of an update to the forum software you will need to reset your password. Please use the "Forgot?" link on the sign in form to do so. If that doesn't work, send me an email at feedback@forzaminardi.com and I'll sort you out!
The jury is out in the trial of a noted pedophile. I'll dispense with the specifics of guilty of counts blah blah blah, and not guilty of blah blah blah, and simply ask 'slammer' or 'no slammer.'
'SLAMMER'
Comments
dig the soap on a rope - you are showing your age.
[Edited on 10/6/2005 by printscreen]
I think we understand Wacko's predelictions.
Now let's talk about major crimes!
Should Bush and Rumsfeld be in the slammer?
The jurors were bought off.
I think it's garbage when some jurors have flat out said they think he's molested children yet come back with 'not guilty' because they didn't like the boys mom.
He'll do it again- I don't believe pedophiles just quit, they don't think what they do is wrong, only that society has a problem.
I am absolutely terrible at predicting these celebrity trials! 0-3 so far on OJ (guilty as hell), Barretta (although there may be a certain justice in him walking, I thought there was NO WAY he'd get off) and now Wack-O, who when the judge allowed the previous allegations to be presented I thought was headed towards a long (or perhaps short) life as a 'Betty' in Folsom or San Quentin.
Anyhow, I particularly enjoy the folks who dispute this verdict and then turn around and support the death penalty.