Existing Users: Because of an update to the forum software you will need to reset your password. Please use the "Forgot?" link on the sign in form to do so. If that doesn't work, send me an email at feedback@forzaminardi.com and I'll sort you out!
Worried? You should be!!!
Another example of hoping for other people's failure rather than getting your arse into gear and doing the job you're supposed to be doing
http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=31973What he shoudl be saying is:
'Yes I know Midland have bought jordan but lets face it EJ had the team on the market for ages, and it has a better points scoring pedigree than Minardi so it was only a matter of time before a buyer was found. To me it makes no difference. We've spent all the money we did'nt spend on testing last year, found decent sponsorship and designed a stonker of a car, this car will beat Midland or Jordan..........and be vyying for midfield.'
Comments
It doesn't matter whether the words are cautious or bullish - its the action on the track that will really count. Which is why hiring Kiesa would be a big mistake.
What I AM saying is that with no testing last year and more money reportedly for this year there is no reason why Minardi should not have designed a car that is capable of doing good things if we have the correct personnel to design a good one.
They are trying for a main sponsor, of course they are. See the GCM interview on the front page and also this thread should cheer you up:
http://www.forzaminardi.com/modules.php?name=XForum&file=viewthread&tid=296
[Edited on 29/1/2005 by viges]
Stoddart is relying on his small design team to come up with the goods. Minardi will be punching above their weight to beat Jordan, and with the PS05 they might, with a good driver on board. Albers and Kiesa? One unproven quantity and one proven slug?
No grounds for massive optimism, but some grounds for hope. I wouldn't be shouting from the rooftops in Stoddart's shoes, but I wouln't be ashamed of the job I'd done either.